PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-100.00%
Negative revenue growth while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
73.96%
Gross profit growth of 73.96% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
16.17%
EBIT growth 50-75% of THM's 28.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
2.48%
Operating income growth under 50% of THM's 28.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-0.22%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 11.46%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-0.69%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 10.87%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-0.69%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 10.87%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.60%
Share change of 0.60% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.59%
Diluted share change of 0.59% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.23%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
33.19%
FCF growth above 1.5x THM's 1.18%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.46%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of THM's 87.86%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-458.46%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 65.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
27.88%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of THM's 51.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
46.25%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of THM's 86.27%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-2405.60%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 71.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
2.22%
Below 50% of THM's 40.78%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
54.61%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
1193.41%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-62.41%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
16.36%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.78%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
151.63%
Debt growth of 151.63% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.89%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.