PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3737.67%
Negative gross profit growth while THM is at 23.49%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-129.97%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 37.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-88.37%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 27.47%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-87.61%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 108.56%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-85.67%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 107.32%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-85.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 107.32%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.53%
Share change of 0.53% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.54%
Diluted share change of 0.54% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.49%
Negative OCF growth while THM is at 109.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-116.39%
Negative FCF growth while THM is at 110.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.90%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of THM's 101.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-332.75%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 103.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-140.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 104.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-3.87%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 102.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-11855.16%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 106.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-579.80%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 103.35%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
54.07%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
372.25%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-47.34%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.79%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.33%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-13.63%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-1.58%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.