PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.20%
Negative gross profit growth while THM is at 0.23%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
84.59%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
69.43%
Positive operating income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
78.32%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
81.99%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
81.99%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
19.87%
Share change of 19.87% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
19.87%
Diluted share change of 19.87% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.81%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-55.75%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.83%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 62.26%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-64.39%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 62.17%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
65.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x THM's 50.23%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
80.68%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of THM's 94.58%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
-1696.35%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 55.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
52.62%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 21.03%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
164.25%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
1464.08%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-8.68%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.58%
AR growth of 7.58% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.08%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
23.14%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.21%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.50%
We cut SG&A while THM invests at 87.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.