PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.52%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-5.32%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.92%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.08%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.70%
Share reduction more than 1.5x THM's 2.81%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.70%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x THM's 2.86%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.34%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-97.04%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.31%
OCF/share CAGR of 28.31% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-460.51%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-292.15%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-35.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-376.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-91.88%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
54.61%
Equity/share CAGR of 54.61% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
1898.00%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-34.44%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.30%
AR growth of 19.30% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.38%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.21%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
226.19%
Debt growth of 226.19% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.29%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.