PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.33%
Gross profit growth under 50% of THM's 99.57%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-63.34%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 29.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-32.04%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 29.78%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-41.36%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 42.98%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-48.81%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 43.14%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-37.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 43.14%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-5.66%
Share reduction while THM is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
2.14%
Diluted share change of 2.14% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.50%
Negative OCF growth while THM is at 44.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-45.89%
Negative FCF growth while THM is at 44.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of THM's 67.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-331.24%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 58.29%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
4.45%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x THM's 3.18%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
-342.39%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 95.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-550.48%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 72.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-66.03%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 8.37%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
136.00%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
2137.12%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-19.25%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.24%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.72%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.82%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
54.31%
Debt growth of 54.31% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8621.88%
SG&A growth well above THM's 8.24%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.