PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.06%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
91.49%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
100.00%
Positive operating income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
91.68%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
92.40%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
91.77%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
9.98%
Share change of 9.98% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.58%
Diluted share change of 1.58% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.15%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
45.00%
Positive FCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.34%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 47.62%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
96.36%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 57.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
99.25%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
63.17%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 41.35% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
50.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x THM's 37.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
86.15%
Positive short-term CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
114.01%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
2306.49%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-38.56%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.67%
AR growth of 94.67% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.06%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-8.08%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
46.92%
Debt growth of 46.92% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.94%
We cut SG&A while THM invests at 94.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.