PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.57%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-914.93%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 9.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-962.74%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 24.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-952.63%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 24.11%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-921.05%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 24.11%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.48%
Share change of 0.48% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
3.48%
Diluted share change of 3.48% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7172.50%
Negative OCF growth while THM is at 28.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-2.35%
Negative FCF growth while THM is at 28.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-186.47%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 81.99%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-175.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 42.82%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
66.44%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 13.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-485.18%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 91.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-562.41%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 35.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-10.65%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
116.39%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
357.67%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-30.23%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
AR growth of 6.85% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.21%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
12.74%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.78%
Debt growth of 0.78% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.02%
We cut SG&A while THM invests at 109.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.