PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.56%
Revenue growth of 20.56% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
5.78%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of THM's 9.45%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
-33.73%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
36.02%
Positive operating income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-103.18%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-103.43%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-103.51%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-5.60%
Share reduction while THM is at 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-7.69%
Reduced diluted shares while THM is at 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
34.45%
Positive FCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
452662.29%
3Y CAGR of 452662.29% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
1349.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 75.83%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1029.72%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 56.63%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
520.34%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 23.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
85.45%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of THM's 95.87%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
88.66%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 38.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
89.51%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 17.04%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
176.23%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
9.64%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
27.12%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.39%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
44.93%
Inventory growth of 44.93% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
6.05%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
12.45%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.95%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.06%
We cut SG&A while THM invests at 96.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.