PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.58%
Revenue growth under 50% of THM's 11.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-0.29%
Negative gross profit growth while THM is at 0.81%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
55.73%
EBIT growth similar to THM's 55.97%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
-39.93%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 55.97%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1589.95%
Net income growth above 1.5x THM's 75.40%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
1412.50%
EPS growth above 1.5x THM's 70.59%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
1350.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x THM's 70.59%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
11.52%
Share change of 11.52% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
17.15%
Diluted share change of 17.15% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.60%
OCF growth under 50% of THM's 84.74%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
13.76%
FCF growth under 50% of THM's 84.74%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4703886.36%
3Y CAGR of 4703886.36% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
837.52%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 97.60%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
869.30%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 91.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
380.28%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 73.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
450.21%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 99.44% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
318.45%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 85.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
207.56%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 66.97%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
322.21%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
69.00%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
106.51%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.52%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
18.51%
Inventory growth of 18.51% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
41.95%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
54.35%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.60%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.50%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.