PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.91%
Negative revenue growth while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.73%
Negative gross profit growth while THM is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-23.90%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 34.66%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-42.51%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 34.66%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-29.19%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 39.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.96%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 87.19%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-33.82%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 87.19%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.93%
Share change of 1.93% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.12%
Slight or no buyback while THM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-115.46%
Negative OCF growth while THM is at 10.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-132.78%
Negative FCF growth while THM is at 10.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.94%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 93.74%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
34.72%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of THM's 50.12%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
61.39%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
367.45%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 93.78% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
232.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 59.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
173.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
372.05%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
32.63%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
115.79%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.65%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
10.83%
Inventory growth of 10.83% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-2.56%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
2.43%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.31%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.82%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.