PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.88%
Revenue growth of 6.88% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
5.72%
Gross profit growth of 5.72% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
161.61%
EBIT growth above 1.5x THM's 15.86%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
28.41%
Operating income growth above 1.5x THM's 15.86%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
129.78%
Net income growth above 1.5x THM's 24.20%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
129.05%
EPS growth above 1.5x THM's 28.95%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
128.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x THM's 28.95%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.19%
Share reduction more than 1.5x THM's 1.58%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
4.18%
Diluted share count expanding well above THM's 1.58%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.75%
Similar OCF growth to THM's 40.08%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
46.01%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x THM's 40.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13524.34%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 89.15%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
325.63%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 55.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
542.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 62.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1019.54%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 92.38% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
231.36%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 37.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
210.48%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 53.27%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1639.18%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
91.17%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
73.83%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3007.54%
AR growth of 3007.54% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-2.20%
Inventory is declining while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.88%
Similar asset growth to THM's 3.57%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
4.10%
BV/share growth above 1.5x THM's 1.89%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.37%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.84%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.