10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.15%
Negative EBIT growth points to weakening core profitability. Benjamin Graham would question management efficiency.
-212.00%
Negative operating income growth means rising costs or falling revenues are eroding core profitability. Benjamin Graham would raise caution.
-694.18%
Negative net income growth shows profitability erosion. Benjamin Graham would worry about solvency and longer-term viability.
-685.71%
Negative EPS growth underscores deteriorating earnings per share. Benjamin Graham would worry about ongoing dilution or weakened profitability.
-685.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth suggests diluted shares grew or net income fell. Benjamin Graham would see this as a serious setback to shareholder value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.96%
OCF growth 5-10% – Moderate. Peter Lynch would consider if new products or expansions could drive bigger OCF improvements.
-30.32%
Negative FCF growth reveals potential liquidity pressures or large capex overshadowing cash generation. Benjamin Graham would demand deeper scrutiny.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-151.71%
A negative 10Y net income/share CAGR reflects a decade of weakening profits. Benjamin Graham would be extremely cautious unless a turnaround is evident.
-151.71%
A negative 5Y net income/share CAGR reveals a mid-term deterioration in bottom-line earnings. Benjamin Graham would be cautious unless a credible turnaround is visible.
-151.71%
Negative 3Y net income/share CAGR highlights recent bottom-line decay. Benjamin Graham would want clarity on cost vs. revenue drivers for the declines.
13.47%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 12% – Excellent long-term book value compounding. Warren Buffett would see if consistent profits plus moderate payouts drive this growth.
13.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 12% – Strong mid-term book value expansion. Warren Buffett would see if steady profits and moderate payout ratios sustain this pace.
13.47%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 12% – Excellent recent net worth expansion. Warren Buffett would check consistent earnings retention or beneficial buybacks driving this growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.89%
Receivables growth above 20% – Alarm. Philip Fisher demands investigation into possible revenue recognition issues or poor AR management.
-83.60%
Negative inventory growth can boost near-term margins if sales remain stable. Benjamin Graham still checks that it’s not from falling demand.
4.82%
Asset growth 0-5% – Minimal. Howard Marks notes the firm may be optimizing existing assets or being cautious with expansions.
4.29%
2-5% annual BV/share growth – Mild. Peter Lynch sees potential if expansions or margin lifts can accelerate compounding.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.00%
SG&A growth above 15% – Aggressive expense expansion. Philip Fisher demands a compelling ROI argument for such heavy spending.