10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.56%
G&A change of 46.56% while CGAU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-299.15%
Marketing expense reduction while CGAU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
12.65%
Other expenses growth less than half of CGAU's 154.55%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
21.95%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CGAU's 134.24%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
21.95%
Total costs growth 50-75% of CGAU's 31.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.08%
D&A growth less than half of CGAU's 22.61%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-22.26%
EBITDA decline while CGAU shows 359.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.95%
Operating income decline while CGAU shows 1124.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.95%
Pre-tax income decline while CGAU shows 654.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.61%
Tax expense growth while CGAU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.57%
Net income decline while CGAU shows 804.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.89%
EPS decline while CGAU shows 828.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.89%
Diluted EPS decline while CGAU shows 828.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.