10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.19%
G&A reduction while CGAU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
244.82%
Marketing expense change of 244.82% while CGAU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
21.12%
Operating expenses growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.12%
Total costs growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-23.51%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45258.26%
Tax expense reduction while CGAU shows 105.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
35.73%
Net income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.25%
EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
54.25%
Diluted EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.22%
Share count change of 40.22% while CGAU is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
40.22%
Diluted share change of 40.22% while CGAU is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.