10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.33%
G&A change of 75.33% while CGAU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
57.54%
Marketing expense change of 57.54% while CGAU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.25%
Operating expenses reduction while CGAU shows 27.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.25%
Total costs reduction while CGAU shows 11.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.24%
Similar EBITDA growth to CGAU's 17.72%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.08%
Operating income decline while CGAU shows 19.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1113116.75%
Other expenses growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.27%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x CGAU's 13.94%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.53%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
27.82%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 17.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.17%
EPS decline while CGAU shows 16.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-61.17%
Diluted EPS decline while CGAU shows 16.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.45%
Share count reduction below 50% of CGAU's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
8.45%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CGAU's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.