10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.15%
G&A growth above 1.5x CGAU's 10.49%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.63%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CGAU's 192.83%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
56.63%
Total costs growth less than half of CGAU's 115.83%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.64%
EBITDA decline while CGAU shows 261.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.64%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
585110.46%
Other expenses growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.57%
Pre-tax income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.61%
Net income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.89%
EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.89%
Diluted EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.92%
Share count change of 100.92% while CGAU is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
100.91%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CGAU's 0.25%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.