10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.20%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
79.20%
Positive growth while CGAU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.52%
G&A reduction while CGAU shows 24.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
100.00%
Marketing expense growth while CGAU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-63.49%
Other expenses reduction while CGAU shows 115.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-57.00%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-57.14%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
122.65%
Interest expense growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-79.20%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
57.85%
EBITDA growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.14%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 7.58%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-844.65%
Other expenses reduction while CGAU shows 21.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
55.69%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 13.13%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.69%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 2.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.03%
EPS change of 56.03% while CGAU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
55.94%
Diluted EPS change of 55.94% while CGAU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.39%
Share count change of 0.39% while CGAU is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.39%
Diluted share change of 0.39% while CGAU is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.