PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.56%
Positive growth while CGAU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
61.98%
Cost increase while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
5.78%
Positive growth while CGAU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-12.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.06%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.54%
Similar other expenses growth to CGAU's 28.38%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
2.87%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CGAU's 59.91%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
38.73%
Total costs growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
378.30%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CGAU's 200.45%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
1567.73%
D&A growth while CGAU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
80.88%
EBITDA growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.03%
EBITDA margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.02%
Operating income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.82%
Operating margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1156.59%
Other expenses reduction while CGAU shows 36.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-43.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
418.52%
Tax expense growth while CGAU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-103.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-103.43%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-103.51%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.60%
Share count reduction while CGAU shows 0.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-7.69%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.