PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.76%
Similar revenue growth to CGAU's 16.36%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
1.95%
Cost growth less than half of CGAU's 19.71%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
23.93%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 1.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.06%
Margin expansion while CGAU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.23%
G&A growth above 1.5x CGAU's 0.79%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.96%
Other expenses reduction while CGAU shows 46.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-15.76%
Operating expenses reduction while CGAU shows 31.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.71%
Total costs reduction while CGAU shows 22.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.23%
Interest expense reduction while CGAU shows 6.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-78.53%
D&A reduction while CGAU shows 69.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
40.53%
EBITDA growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.39%
EBITDA margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.71%
Operating income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
77.70%
Operating margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1117.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
27.73%
Pre-tax income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.34%
Pre-tax margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-39.31%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
110.12%
Net income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
81.51%
Net margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
95.24%
EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.00%
Diluted EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.91%
Share count increase while CGAU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.53%
Diluted share increase while CGAU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.