PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.91%
Revenue decline while CGAU shows 8.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.05%
Cost growth less than half of CGAU's 27.12%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-15.73%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.82%
G&A growth 1.25-1.5x CGAU's 25.62%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize overhead control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.14%
Other expenses growth less than half of CGAU's 41.38%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
19.60%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CGAU's 42.44%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.98%
Total costs growth less than half of CGAU's 30.44%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
31.51%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CGAU's 9.74%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
292.89%
D&A growth above 1.5x CGAU's 42.42%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-34.54%
EBITDA decline while CGAU shows 79.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
68.52%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of CGAU's 99.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-29.30%
Pre-tax income decline while CGAU shows 57.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.52%
Pre-tax margin decline while CGAU shows 61.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.62%
Tax expense reduction while CGAU shows 131.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-29.19%
Net income decline while CGAU shows 43.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.39%
Net margin decline while CGAU shows 48.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.96%
EPS decline while CGAU shows 43.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.82%
Diluted EPS decline while CGAU shows 43.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.93%
Share count reduction below 50% of CGAU's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.12%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CGAU's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.