PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.72%
Revenue growth below 50% of CGAU's 86.37%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
15.46%
Cost growth 50-75% of CGAU's 29.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-6.23%
Gross profit decline while CGAU shows 1396.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.82%
Margin decline while CGAU shows 702.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.42%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.97%
Other expenses growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.94%
Operating expenses growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.00%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CGAU's 13.10%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
23.83%
Interest expense growth less than half of CGAU's 79.94%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
10.71%
D&A growth less than half of CGAU's 23.66%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-13.47%
EBITDA decline while CGAU shows 986.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.94%
EBITDA margin decline while CGAU shows 2200.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.23%
Operating income decline while CGAU shows 419.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.82%
Operating margin decline while CGAU shows 271.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.31%
Other expenses reduction while CGAU shows 215.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.85%
Pre-tax income decline while CGAU shows 407.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.13%
Pre-tax margin decline while CGAU shows 265.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.78%
Tax expense growth less than half of CGAU's 538.73%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-58.14%
Net income decline while CGAU shows 252.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.84%
Net margin decline while CGAU shows 181.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.75%
EPS decline while CGAU shows 255.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-59.49%
Diluted EPS decline while CGAU shows 250.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.14%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CGAU's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.