PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.40%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 0.43%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
4.97%
Cost increase while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
3.99%
Similar gross profit growth to CGAU's 4.75%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-0.39%
Margin decline while CGAU shows 4.31% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
G&A growth less than half of CGAU's 47.31%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.95%
Other expenses reduction while CGAU shows 199.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.60%
Operating expenses reduction while CGAU shows 40.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.48%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CGAU's 0.81%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-42.71%
Interest expense reduction while CGAU shows 2.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.08%
D&A growth less than half of CGAU's 113.21%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-243.18%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-237.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-321.81%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-391.21%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-378.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.02%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1188.31%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1142.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1224.26%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1287.50%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.22%
Share count increase while CGAU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.12%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.