PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.43%
Similar revenue growth to CGAU's 17.72%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
14.49%
Cost growth above 1.5x CGAU's 4.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
19.06%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CGAU's 57.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.39%
Margin expansion below 50% of CGAU's 33.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.36%
G&A growth while CGAU reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.20%
Other expenses growth less than half of CGAU's 79112.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
62.19%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CGAU's 210.80%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
27.63%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x CGAU's 20.20%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-21.72%
Interest expense reduction while CGAU shows 0.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
20.79%
D&A growth less than half of CGAU's 47.50%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
2.70%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CGAU's 15.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-12.54%
EBITDA margin decline while CGAU shows 8.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.47%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 6.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
28.99%
Operating margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-373.34%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.13%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CGAU's 3.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.08%
Tax expense growth less than half of CGAU's 58.09%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-12.86%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.31%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.72%
Share count reduction below 50% of CGAU's 0.46%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.48%
Diluted share increase while CGAU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.