PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
51.64%
Positive growth while CGAU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
107.74%
Cost growth above 1.5x CGAU's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
20.77%
Positive growth while CGAU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-20.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.81%
G&A growth above 1.5x CGAU's 43.05%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.00%
Other expenses growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
91.93%
Operating expenses growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
102.42%
Total costs growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
228.00%
Interest expense growth less than half of CGAU's 1140.07%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
57.46%
D&A growth while CGAU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-139.16%
EBITDA decline while CGAU shows 780.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-125.82%
EBITDA margin decline while CGAU shows 787.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
72.34%
Operating income growth 50-75% of CGAU's 139.11%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
13.64%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CGAU's 139.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1512.90%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-187.74%
Pre-tax income decline while CGAU shows 261.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-157.86%
Pre-tax margin decline while CGAU shows 262.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.30%
Tax expense growth less than half of CGAU's 36.52%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-367.69%
Net income decline while CGAU shows 158.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-276.52%
Net margin decline while CGAU shows 158.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-368.62%
EPS decline while CGAU shows 157.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-381.69%
Diluted EPS decline while CGAU shows 152.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.22%
Share count increase while CGAU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 0.47%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.