PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
90.58%
Growth of 90.58% while DC shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
94.02%
Cost growth of 94.02% while DC maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
81.32%
Growth of 81.32% while DC shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-4.86%
Margin decline while DC shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.30%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.87%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-37.70%
Operating expenses reduction while DC shows 80.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
54.52%
Total costs growth 50-75% of DC's 80.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
456.58%
Interest expense change of 456.58% while DC maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
141.56%
D&A growth while DC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
705.60%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x DC's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
417.76%
Margin change of 417.76% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
56.24%
Operating income growth while DC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-18.02%
Operating margin decline while DC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
81.20%
Other expenses growth less than half of DC's 455.47%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
306.85%
Pre-tax income growth while DC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
208.54%
Margin change of 208.54% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
60.09%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x DC's 7.15%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
169.04%
Net income growth while DC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
136.23%
Margin change of 136.23% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
168.18%
EPS growth while DC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
159.09%
Diluted EPS growth while DC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.78%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x DC's 14.84%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
20.22%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of DC's 14.84%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.