PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.58%
Growth of 2.58% while FURY shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
7.83%
Cost growth above 1.5x FURY's 3.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-0.29%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.80%
Margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.50%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
174.36%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x FURY's 31.43%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
73.66%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FURY's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
31.47%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FURY's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
9.33%
Interest expense growth while FURY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.22%
D&A change of 13.22% while FURY maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-26.19%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.05%
EBITDA margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.93%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.44%
Operating margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
106.70%
Other expenses growth while FURY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
64.83%
Pre-tax income growth while FURY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.68%
Margin change of 60.68% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-13.42%
Tax expense reduction while FURY shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1589.95%
Net income growth while FURY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1552.48%
Margin change of 1552.48% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1412.50%
EPS growth while FURY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1350.00%
Diluted EPS growth while FURY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.52%
Share count increase while FURY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.15%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FURY's 2.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.