10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.76%
Growth of 15.76% while FURY shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
1.95%
Cost increase while FURY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
23.93%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of FURY's 35.43%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
7.06%
Margin change of 7.06% while FURY shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.23%
G&A growth less than half of FURY's 41.42%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.96%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.76%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-8.71%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.23%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-78.53%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
40.53%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of FURY's 68.24%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
21.39%
Margin change of 21.39% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
105.71%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x FURY's 43.38%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
77.70%
Margin change of 77.70% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-1117.48%
Other expenses reduction while FURY shows 98.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
27.73%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FURY's 76.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.34%
Margin change of 10.34% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-39.31%
Tax expense reduction while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
110.12%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 76.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
81.51%
Margin change of 81.51% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
95.24%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 76.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
105.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 76.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
14.91%
Share count reduction below 50% of FURY's 14.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
8.53%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FURY's 11.70%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.