PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.92%
Growth of 15.92% while FURY shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
14.67%
Cost increase while FURY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
16.66%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FURY's 3.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.63%
Margin change of 0.63% while FURY shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.83%
Other expenses growth less than half of FURY's 391.52%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-1.07%
Operating expenses reduction while FURY shows 33.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.77%
Total costs growth less than half of FURY's 33.23%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-16.91%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
16.33%
D&A growth while FURY reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.56%
EBITDA growth while FURY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.73%
Margin change of 5.73% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
70.99%
Operating income growth while FURY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.50%
Margin change of 47.50% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-244.28%
Other expenses reduction while FURY shows 57.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
31.80%
Pre-tax income growth while FURY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.70%
Margin change of 13.70% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
130.66%
Tax expense change of 130.66% while FURY maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
-3.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.39%
Net margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.08%
Share count reduction while FURY shows 9.39% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
1.15%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FURY's 3.95%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.