PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.72%
Growth of 1.72% while FURY shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
15.46%
Cost growth above 1.5x FURY's 9.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-6.23%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.82%
Margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.42%
G&A reduction while FURY shows 9.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.97%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of FURY's 99.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
35.94%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of FURY's 63.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
22.00%
Total costs growth less than half of FURY's 60.69%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
23.83%
Interest expense growth while FURY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.71%
D&A change of 10.71% while FURY maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-13.47%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.94%
EBITDA margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.82%
Operating margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.31%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-24.85%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.13%
Pre-tax margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.78%
Tax expense growth while FURY reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-58.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.84%
Net margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.75%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-59.49%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.14%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.64%
Diluted share change of 0.64% while FURY is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.