10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.88%
Growth of 6.88% while FURY shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
8.49%
Cost increase while FURY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
5.72%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 4.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-1.08%
Margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.80%
G&A growth while FURY reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.92%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-28.63%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.36%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.84%
Interest expense growth while FURY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.48%
D&A growth while FURY reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
196.24%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x FURY's 82.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
190.05%
Margin change of 190.05% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
28.41%
Operating income growth 50-75% of FURY's 56.34%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
20.14%
Margin change of 20.14% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
100.53%
Other expenses growth less than half of FURY's 262.69%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
155.55%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x FURY's 80.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
151.97%
Margin change of 151.97% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
65.95%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of FURY's 100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
129.78%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x FURY's 79.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
127.87%
Margin change of 127.87% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
129.05%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FURY's 79.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
128.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FURY's 79.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.19%
Share count increase while FURY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.18%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FURY's 0.25%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.