PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
51.64%
Growth of 51.64% while FURY shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
107.74%
Cost growth of 107.74% while FURY maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
20.77%
Growth of 20.77% while FURY shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-20.36%
Margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.81%
G&A growth while FURY reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of FURY's 184.82%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
91.93%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FURY's 57.69%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
102.42%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FURY's 57.69%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
228.00%
Interest expense growth while FURY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
57.46%
D&A growth while FURY reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-139.16%
EBITDA decline while FURY shows 97.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-125.82%
EBITDA margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
72.34%
Operating income growth while FURY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.64%
Margin change of 13.64% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-1512.90%
Other expenses reduction while FURY shows 100.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-187.74%
Pre-tax income decline while FURY shows 96.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-157.86%
Pre-tax margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.30%
Tax expense growth while FURY reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-367.69%
Net income decline while FURY shows 96.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-276.52%
Net margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-368.62%
EPS decline while FURY shows 96.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-381.69%
Diluted EPS decline while FURY shows 96.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.22%
Share count increase while FURY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FURY's 0.28%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.