10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.40%
Revenue growth below 50% of IAUX's 95.51%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.97%
Cost growth less than half of IAUX's 71.61%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
3.99%
Gross profit growth below 50% of IAUX's 596.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.39%
Margin decline while IAUX shows 353.79% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
Similar G&A growth to IAUX's 24.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.95%
Other expenses reduction while IAUX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.60%
Operating expenses reduction while IAUX shows 4622.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.48%
Total costs growth less than half of IAUX's 14.49%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-42.71%
Interest expense reduction while IAUX shows 19.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.08%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x IAUX's 8.59%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
-243.18%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-237.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.40%
Operating income decline while IAUX shows 29.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.03%
Operating margin decline while IAUX shows 64.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-321.81%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-391.21%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-378.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.02%
Tax expense reduction while IAUX shows 400.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1188.31%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1142.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1224.26%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1287.50%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.22%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x IAUX's 3.56%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-5.12%
Diluted share reduction while IAUX shows 3.56% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.