PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.56%
Growth of 20.56% while ITRG shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
61.98%
Cost growth above 1.5x ITRG's 1.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.78%
Positive growth while ITRG shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-12.26%
Margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.06%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.54%
Other expenses growth while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.87%
Operating expenses growth while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
38.73%
Total costs growth while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
378.30%
Interest expense growth while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1567.73%
D&A growth above 1.5x ITRG's 7.38%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
80.88%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 19.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
50.03%
Margin change of 50.03% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
36.02%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 17.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.82%
Margin change of 12.82% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-1156.59%
Other expenses reduction while ITRG shows 97.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-43.30%
Pre-tax income decline while ITRG shows 22.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
418.52%
Tax expense growth while ITRG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-103.18%
Net income decline while ITRG shows 26.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-102.64%
Net margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-103.43%
EPS decline while ITRG shows 28.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-103.51%
Diluted EPS decline while ITRG shows 28.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.60%
Share count reduction while ITRG shows 0.50% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-7.69%
Diluted share reduction while ITRG shows 0.50% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.