PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.58%
Growth of 2.58% while ITRG shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
7.83%
Cost increase while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-0.29%
Gross profit decline while ITRG shows 14.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.80%
Margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.50%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
174.36%
Other expenses growth while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
73.66%
Operating expenses growth while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.47%
Total costs growth while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.33%
Interest expense growth less than half of ITRG's 1180.76%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
13.22%
D&A growth while ITRG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-26.19%
EBITDA decline while ITRG shows 21.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.05%
EBITDA margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.93%
Operating income decline while ITRG shows 15.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.44%
Operating margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
106.70%
Other expenses growth less than half of ITRG's 5537.38%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
64.83%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 26.70%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
60.68%
Margin change of 60.68% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-13.42%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
1589.95%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 37.37%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1552.48%
Margin change of 1552.48% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1412.50%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 46.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1350.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 46.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
11.52%
Share count reduction below 50% of ITRG's 17.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
17.15%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ITRG's 17.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.