10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.72%
Growth of 1.72% while ITRG shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
15.46%
Cost increase while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-6.23%
Gross profit decline while ITRG shows 10.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.82%
Margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.42%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.97%
Other expenses growth less than half of ITRG's 229.47%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
35.94%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ITRG's 17.43%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
22.00%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x ITRG's 16.29%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
23.83%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ITRG's 5.70%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
10.71%
D&A growth while ITRG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.47%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.94%
EBITDA margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.82%
Operating margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.31%
Other expenses reduction while ITRG shows 130.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.85%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.13%
Pre-tax margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.78%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of ITRG's 22.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-58.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.84%
Net margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.75%
EPS decline while ITRG shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-59.49%
Diluted EPS decline while ITRG shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.14%
Share count reduction while ITRG shows 24.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 24.13%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.