PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
25.70%
Growth of 25.70% while ITRG shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
5.67%
Cost increase while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
40.49%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 6.19%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
11.77%
Margin change of 11.77% while ITRG shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.07%
G&A reduction while ITRG shows 0.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
32.58%
Other expenses growth less than half of ITRG's 10416.98%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
10.48%
Similar operating expenses growth to ITRG's 10.83%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
6.96%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ITRG's 10.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
6.04%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ITRG's 3.61%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
8.68%
D&A growth while ITRG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
52.32%
EBITDA growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.18%
Margin change of 21.18% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
51.02%
Operating income growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.14%
Margin change of 20.14% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1409.26%
Other expenses growth while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
69.45%
Pre-tax income growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.80%
Margin change of 34.80% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
115.82%
Tax expense growth while ITRG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.40%
Net income growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.90%
Margin change of 10.90% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
38.22%
EPS growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.03%
Diluted EPS growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.92%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 20.95%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.62%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 20.95%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.