10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
90.58%
Growth of 90.58% while ODV shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
94.02%
Cost growth of 94.02% while ODV maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
81.32%
Growth of 81.32% while ODV shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-4.86%
Margin decline while ODV shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.30%
G&A reduction while ODV shows 17.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.87%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-37.70%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
54.52%
Total costs growth while ODV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
456.58%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ODV's 9.89%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
141.56%
D&A growth above 1.5x ODV's 22.64%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
705.60%
EBITDA growth while ODV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
417.76%
Margin change of 417.76% while ODV is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
56.24%
Similar operating income growth to ODV's 56.72%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-18.02%
Operating margin decline while ODV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
81.20%
Other expenses growth while ODV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
306.85%
Pre-tax income growth while ODV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
208.54%
Margin change of 208.54% while ODV is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
60.09%
Tax expense growth while ODV reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
169.04%
Net income growth while ODV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
136.23%
Margin change of 136.23% while ODV is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
168.18%
EPS growth while ODV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
159.09%
Diluted EPS growth while ODV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.78%
Share count reduction below 50% of ODV's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
20.22%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ODV's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.