PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
90.58%
Growth of 90.58% while THM shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
94.02%
Cost growth above 1.5x THM's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
81.32%
Positive growth while THM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.86%
Margin decline while THM shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.30%
G&A reduction while THM shows 106.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.87%
Other expenses reduction while THM shows 277.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-37.70%
Operating expenses reduction while THM shows 167.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
54.52%
Total costs growth less than half of THM's 367.10%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
456.58%
Interest expense change of 456.58% while THM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
141.56%
D&A change of 141.56% while THM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
705.60%
EBITDA growth while THM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
417.76%
Margin change of 417.76% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
56.24%
Operating income growth while THM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-18.02%
Operating margin decline while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
81.20%
Other expenses growth while THM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
306.85%
Pre-tax income growth while THM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
208.54%
Margin change of 208.54% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
60.09%
Tax expense change of 60.09% while THM maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
169.04%
Net income growth while THM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
136.23%
Margin change of 136.23% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
168.18%
EPS growth while THM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
159.09%
Diluted EPS growth while THM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.78%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x THM's 2.62%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
20.22%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of THM's 2.62%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.