PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.56%
Growth of 20.56% while THM shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
61.98%
Cost growth of 61.98% while THM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
5.78%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of THM's 9.45%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-12.26%
Margin decline while THM shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.06%
G&A reduction while THM shows 96.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.54%
Other expenses growth less than half of THM's 172.09%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
2.87%
Operating expenses growth less than half of THM's 121.33%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
38.73%
Total costs growth less than half of THM's 121.33%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
378.30%
Interest expense change of 378.30% while THM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
1567.73%
D&A change of 1567.73% while THM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
80.88%
EBITDA growth while THM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.03%
Margin change of 50.03% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
36.02%
Operating income growth while THM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.82%
Margin change of 12.82% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-1156.59%
Other expenses reduction while THM shows 350.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-43.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
418.52%
Tax expense growth while THM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-103.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.64%
Net margin decline while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-103.43%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-103.51%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.60%
Share count reduction while THM shows 0.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-7.69%
Diluted share reduction while THM shows 0.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.