PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.88%
Growth of 6.88% while THM shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
8.49%
Cost growth of 8.49% while THM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
5.72%
Growth of 5.72% while THM shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-1.08%
Margin decline while THM shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.80%
G&A growth while THM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.92%
Other expenses reduction while THM shows 23.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-28.63%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.36%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.84%
Interest expense change of 1.84% while THM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
4.48%
D&A growth while THM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
196.24%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x THM's 15.86%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
190.05%
Margin change of 190.05% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
28.41%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x THM's 15.86%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
20.14%
Margin change of 20.14% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
100.53%
Other expenses growth less than half of THM's 403.58%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
155.55%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x THM's 24.20%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
151.97%
Margin change of 151.97% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
65.95%
Tax expense growth while THM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
129.78%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x THM's 24.20%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
127.87%
Margin change of 127.87% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
129.05%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x THM's 28.95%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
128.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x THM's 28.95%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.19%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x THM's 1.58%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
4.18%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of THM's 1.58%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.