10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.43%
Growth of 17.43% while THM shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
14.49%
Cost growth of 14.49% while THM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
19.06%
Positive growth while THM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.39%
Margin change of 1.39% while THM shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.36%
G&A growth while THM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.20%
Similar other expenses growth to THM's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
62.19%
Operating expenses growth while THM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.63%
Total costs growth while THM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.72%
Interest expense reduction while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
20.79%
D&A change of 20.79% while THM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
2.70%
EBITDA growth below 50% of THM's 55.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-12.54%
EBITDA margin decline while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.47%
Operating income growth 50-75% of THM's 93.86%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
28.99%
Margin change of 28.99% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-373.34%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.13%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of THM's 53.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14.73%
Pre-tax margin decline while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.08%
Tax expense growth less than half of THM's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-12.86%
Net income decline while THM shows 53.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.79%
Net margin decline while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.50%
EPS decline while THM shows 54.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.31%
Diluted EPS decline while THM shows 54.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.72%
Share count change of 0.72% while THM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.48%
Diluted share change of 0.48% while THM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.