PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
51.64%
Growth of 51.64% while THM shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
107.74%
Cost growth of 107.74% while THM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
20.77%
Growth of 20.77% while THM shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-20.36%
Margin decline while THM shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.81%
G&A growth while THM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.00%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x THM's 25.10%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
91.93%
Operating expenses growth while THM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
102.42%
Total costs growth while THM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
228.00%
Interest expense change of 228.00% while THM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
57.46%
D&A change of 57.46% while THM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-139.16%
EBITDA decline while THM shows 28.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-125.82%
EBITDA margin decline while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
72.34%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x THM's 35.92%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
13.64%
Margin change of 13.64% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-1512.90%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-187.74%
Pre-tax income decline while THM shows 30.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-157.86%
Pre-tax margin decline while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.30%
Tax expense change of 7.30% while THM maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
-367.69%
Net income decline while THM shows 30.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-276.52%
Net margin decline while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-368.62%
EPS decline while THM shows 31.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-381.69%
Diluted EPS decline while THM shows 31.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.22%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x THM's 1.45%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x THM's 1.45%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.