40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-68.75%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-68.75% vs BTE's -5.55%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.75%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x BTE's -5.55%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-14.75%
Receivables growth less than half of BTE's 10.36%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.88%
Other current assets growth 50-75% of BTE's -87.89%. Bruce Berkowitz notes fewer expansions. Possibly simpler working capital.
2.30%
Below half of BTE's -19.12%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.13%
Below half BTE's 9.50%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
1.20%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to BTE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.20%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to BTE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
276.47%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to BTE's zero value, indicating better performance.
204.00%
Less than half of BTE's -50.27%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-95.51%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to BTE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.14%
Below half of BTE's 9.22%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.54%
Below half of BTE's 7.97%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-80.53%
Above 1.5x BTE's -13.11%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43866.67%
≥ 1.5x BTE's 8.31%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
402.36%
Similar yoy changes to BTE's 444.87%. Walter Schloss finds parallel near-term liability trends.
38.54%
Less than half of BTE's -3.52%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-10.85%
Above 1.5x BTE's -1.18%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
-11.13%
Both BTE and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
-20.00%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to BTE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-8.75%
Less than half of BTE's 11.21%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-9.35%
Less than half of BTE's 2.53%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.60%
Less than half of BTE's 2.08%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-99.96%
Less than half of BTE's 0.00%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-12.42%
Below half BTE's 3.68%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
5.08%
Less than half of BTE's -4.25%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.83%
Below half BTE's 50.47%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-4.54%
Below half BTE's 7.97%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
276.47%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to BTE's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.95%
Above 1.5x BTE's -1.25%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
-1.68%
1.25-1.5x BTE's -1.22%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier net leverage vs. competitor.
