40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
8.88%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of CRK's 147.91%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.88%
Below half of CRK's 147.91%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-33.40%
Receivables growth less than half of CRK's 20.07%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.67%
Other current assets growth < half of CRK's -97.96%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
10.96%
0.5-0.75x CRK's 17.58%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
1.69%
Below half CRK's -1.12%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-0.57%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.57%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2500.00%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating better performance.
-6.49%
Less than half of CRK's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-52.77%
Less than half of CRK's 122.60%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.89%
0.75-0.9x CRK's -1.13%. Bill Ackman questions if the competitor invests more robustly in future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.52%
Similar yoy to CRK's 0.49%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions. Evaluate the quality of these assets.
-77.81%
Less than half of CRK's 19.91%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.44%
Below half of CRK's 153.50%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
364.29%
Less than half of CRK's 1065.14%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
21.75%
Less than half of CRK's 57.62%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.39%
Both CRK and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
19.23%
Less than half of CRK's 60.75%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
2.82%
Less than half of CRK's -2.15%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.37%
Less than half of CRK's 2.11%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.18%
Less than half of CRK's 5.03%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-20.28%
Less than half of CRK's 4.14%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-32.67%
≥ 1.5x CRK's -7.22%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
3.51%
Less than half of CRK's -1.05%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.70%
Below half CRK's -23.29%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.52%
Similar yoy to CRK's 0.49%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total capital.
2500.00%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.09%
Less than half of CRK's 1.85%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-1.25%
50-75% of CRK's -2.04%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.
