40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-39.78%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-39.78% vs CRK's -16.76%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-100.00%
Both CRK and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-39.78%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x CRK's -16.76%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
80.59%
Receivables growth less than half of CRK's -7.16%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-100.00%
Inventory growth below half of CRK's 11701.20%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-70.95%
Above 1.5x CRK's -39.77%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
-14.05%
Below half of CRK's -31.00%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
1.82%
Below half CRK's 12.21%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-0.69%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.69%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1015.38%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating better performance.
-2.11%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-61.81%
1.1-1.25x CRK's -56.03%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm invests in intangible or other non-core areas more aggressively.
1.25%
Below half of CRK's 11.76%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.03%
Below half of CRK's -2.14%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
380.23%
Less than half of CRK's -0.35%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.14%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Similar yoy growth to CRK's -94.16%. Walter Schloss notes parallel approach to deferred revenue.
-26.90%
Less than half of CRK's 76.34%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
1.63%
Less than half of CRK's -0.48%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.02%
Less than half of CRK's 1.88%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-21.19%
Both CRK and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
-2.94%
Less than half of CRK's 5.66%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-2.24%
Less than half of CRK's 0.79%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-3.37%
Less than half of CRK's 1.90%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.40%
Less than half of CRK's 41.92%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
27.50%
Above 1.5x CRK's 4.73%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
17.48%
Below half CRK's -162.44%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
2.21%
Less than half of CRK's -1.32%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.71%
Below half CRK's -11.01%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.03%
Below half CRK's -2.14%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
1015.38%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating better performance.
-2.33%
Less than half of CRK's 3.23%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
2.85%
50-75% of CRK's 4.40%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.
