40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
2337.50%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x CRK's 10.14%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2337.50%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x CRK's 10.14%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-1.74%
Receivables growth less than half of CRK's 10.11%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6700.00%
Other current assets growth < half of CRK's -47.30%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
19.50%
≥ 1.5x CRK's 2.95%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
12.81%
Below half CRK's -5.37%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.15%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.15%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.45%
Less than half of CRK's -433735.14%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.30%
Below half of CRK's -4.98%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.07%
Below half of CRK's -4.48%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-81.57%
Above 1.5x CRK's -3.15%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41125.00%
≥ 1.5x CRK's 80.91%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
-27.37%
Less than half of CRK's -69.34%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-17.99%
Less than half of CRK's -40.38%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-0.10%
Less than half of CRK's -6.64%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.63%
Less than half of CRK's 215.42%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-3.93%
Similar yoy to CRK's -4.91%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in long-term liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.72%
50-75% of CRK's -14.21%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a lower yoy liability increase.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.13%
Below half CRK's 63.57%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
2.25%
Less than half of CRK's 175.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.63%
0.75-0.9x CRK's 43.06%. Bill Ackman wonders if competitor is growing equity faster.
3.07%
Below half CRK's -4.48%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.22%
Less than half of CRK's -6.64%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-3.46%
50-75% of CRK's -6.81%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.
