40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-38.42%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-38.42% vs PR's -35.78%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.42%
Similar yoy growth to PR's -35.78%. Walter Schloss would note comparable liquidity expansions. Examine capital usage strategies.
-23.94%
Receivables growth above 1.5x PR's -2.93%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-59.38%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
49.34%
Similar to PR's 46.78%. Walter Schloss would confirm standard short-term asset patterns.
-10.54%
0.5-0.75x PR's -15.31%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
-5.22%
Below half PR's 4.28%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-11.10%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.10%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.34%
Less than half of PR's 24.36%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-5.85%
Below half of PR's 3.98%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.43%
Below half of PR's 2.45%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-39.21%
Less than half of PR's 1488.74%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.27%
1.25-1.5x PR's -18.46%. Martin Whitman sees a potentially higher near-term liability load.
-25.42%
Less than half of PR's 15.37%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
23.44%
Above 1.5x PR's 0.03%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.55%
Less than half of PR's 8.51%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-61.67%
Less than half of PR's 10.69%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-5.79%
Less than half of PR's 1.57%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.61%
Less than half of PR's 5.06%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.62%
0.5-0.75x PR's 7.68%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
-63.48%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.83%
Below half PR's 0.79%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-6.43%
Below half PR's 2.45%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.83%
Less than half of PR's -0.11%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
27.05%
Above 1.5x PR's 7.15%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.
