40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
500.59%
Cash & equivalents growing 500.59% while PR's declined -17.57%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-100.00%
Both PR and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
500.59%
Below half of PR's -17.57%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-48.24%
Similar receivables growth to PR's -59.13%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
68.33%
Inventory growth below half of PR's -100.00%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-10.20%
Other current assets growth < half of PR's -38.69%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
41.98%
Below half of PR's -39.60%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-15.84%
Below half PR's 1.48%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-2.30%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.30%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-95.29%
Both PR and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
17.91%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
56.25%
Less than half of PR's -68.55%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-13.72%
Below half of PR's 0.43%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.25%
≥ 1.5x PR's -3.95%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
349.75%
Less than half of PR's -77.56%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.67%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-94.37%
Both PR and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-86.69%
1.1-1.25x PR's -74.23%. Bill Ackman wonders if the firm is incurring more one-time charges than competitor.
37.74%
Less than half of PR's -75.21%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-19.28%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-12.65%
Both PR and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
-41.50%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-25.46%
Less than half of PR's 17.41%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-20.15%
Less than half of PR's 0.61%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.83%
Less than half of PR's -32.32%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
29.20%
Above 1.5x PR's 13.93%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
-33.91%
Both PR and the company show zero Retained Earnings Growth.
69.52%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.73%
Below half PR's 13.93%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-7.25%
≥ 1.5x PR's -3.95%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-95.29%
Both PR and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-3.85%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-22.75%
Less than half of PR's 1.95%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
