40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
31.98%
Cash & equivalents growing 31.98% while PR's declined -54.57%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.98%
Below half of PR's -54.57%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
3.27%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.78%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-14.72%
Below half of PR's -43.90%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-5.49%
Both PR and the company show zero PP&E (Net) Growth.
-0.11%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.38%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.41%
Below half of PR's 0.05%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.82%
≥ 1.5x PR's -0.11%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-8.67%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.33%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
462.31%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.47%
Less than half of PR's -99.62%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
5.33%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.30%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.58%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.61%
Higher Total Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.31%
Less than half of PR's -2.93%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.02%
Less than half of PR's -0.00%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-103.20%
Below half PR's 104.06%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
1.25%
Less than half of PR's -340.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-0.02%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-10.86%
≥ 1.5x PR's -0.00%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-1.82%
≥ 1.5x PR's -0.11%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.77%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.86%
Less than half of PR's 54.57%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
