40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-37.29%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-37.29% vs PR's -59.07%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-100.00%
Both PR and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-37.29%
Cash + STI yoy 0.5-0.75x PR's -59.07%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging short-term reserves. Confirm debt coverage.
77.76%
Receivables growth 1.25-1.5x PR's 59.54%. Martin Whitman would worry that the company may be booking revenue too aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
290.91%
1.1-1.25x PR's 244.18%. Bill Ackman might question if the company is accumulating more extraneous short-term items.
-11.96%
Below half of PR's -46.44%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.57%
0.75-0.9x PR's 2.97%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor invests more heavily in future capacity.
0.18%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.18%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
315.38%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.93%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.25%
Less than half of PR's -61.44%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
2.14%
0.5-0.75x PR's 2.89%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.29%
≥ 1.5x PR's 0.08%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
376.67%
Above 1.5x PR's 84.30%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Similar yoy growth to PR's -100.00%. Walter Schloss notes parallel approach to deferred revenue.
-89.69%
Exceeding 1.5x PR's -12.96%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-15.56%
1.1-1.25x PR's -12.62%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is taking on more near-term obligations than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.99%
Both PR and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
3.23%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.94%
1.25-1.5x PR's 4.68%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier unknown future burdens.
-1.64%
Less than half of PR's -96.30%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.19%
Similar yoy to PR's -4.33%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total liabilities.
28.55%
Above 1.5x PR's 4.55%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
34.72%
Below half PR's 110.01%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-1.40%
Less than half of PR's -154.97%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.51%
≥ 1.5x PR's 0.65%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
0.29%
0.75-0.9x PR's 0.35%. Bill Ackman wonders if competitor invests or leverages more aggressively.
315.38%
Below half PR's -100.00%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-1.10%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.95%
Less than half of PR's 59.07%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
